PepLabo Download

Foundayo’s clinical studies, as the label reports them

Foundayo™ (orforglipron) was approved on the strength of two large trials. Our overview of the medicine gives the headline averages; this article looks at how those trials were built, what the rest of section 14 of the label reports, and which other published orforglipron trials sit around them, with the design and limits of each.

Published · Updated · GLP-1 medications · Written by the PepLabo editorial team

Two trials, two names

The label calls them Trial 1 (NCT05869903) and Trial 2 (NCT05872620). On ClinicalTrials.gov, the US public trial registry, Eli Lilly and Company lists them as the phase 3 studies ATTAIN-1 and ATTAIN-2 [1][2][3].

The label adds a technical note: the trials used an investigational formulation of orforglipron, and the results are shown as the equivalent once-daily Foundayo™ doses. That is why the tables speak of 5.5 mg, 9 mg and 17.2 mg [1].

Same trial, two sets of numbers

If you read the published ATTAIN-1 paper next to the label, the doses and some figures look different. The paper reports the trial doses of 6, 12 and 36 mg, which the label converts into Foundayo™ tablet strengths; the abstract of a later trial, ACHIEVE-4, states the equivalence for the top dose directly, 36 mg capsule to 17.2 mg tablet [1][4][11].

ATTAIN-1 at week 72, in the label and in the published paper
MeasureUS label (Foundayo™ doses) [1]NEJM paper (trial doses) [4]
Doses5.5, 9 and 17.2 mg6, 12 and 36 mg
Average weight change−7.4%, −8.3%, −11.1%; placebo −2.1%−7.5%, −8.4%, −11.2%; placebo −2.1%
Lost at least 10%, top dose54.5%; placebo 13%54.6%; placebo 12.9%
Lost at least 20%, top dose18.4%; placebo 2.9%18.4%; placebo 2.8%
Stopped because of side effects8% across Trials 1 and 2; placebo 3%5.3% to 10.3% by dose; placebo 2.7%

How the trials were set up

Both were randomised and double-blind, with a placebo group. In Trial 1, people were assigned in a 3:3:3:4 ratio to the three doses or placebo; in Trial 2 the ratio was 1:1:1:2. Doses were raised step by step, as in section 2.1 of the label [1].

Every participant, including those on placebo, received standard lifestyle support: advice on a reduced-calorie diet and physical activity counselling with a recommended minimum of 150 minutes a week. The main outcome was the average percent change in body weight from the start to week 72 [1].

Who was enrolled

  • Trial 1: adults with a BMI of 30 or more, or 27 to under 30 together with a weight-related condition, for example high blood pressure or sleep apnea. People with type 2 diabetes were excluded. Average age 45, 64% women, average weight 103.2 kg [1].
  • Trial 2: adults with a BMI of 27 or more and type 2 diabetes, with an HbA1c between 7% and 10%. People using DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists or injected glucose-lowering medicines such as insulin were excluded. Average age 57, 47% women, average weight 101.4 kg, average HbA1c 8%; 11% had diabetic eye disease [1].

Beyond the average

At week 72 the average weight change at 17.2 mg was −11.1% against −2.1% on placebo in Trial 1, and −9.6% against −2.5% in Trial 2. The label adds that weight fell regardless of age, sex, race, ethnicity, starting BMI or blood sugar status [1].

Averages hide a wide spread, so the label also counts how many people crossed set thresholds. The table shows the highest dose; at 5.5 mg in Trial 1, for example, 32.5% lost at least 10% [1]. The label marks some of the higher-threshold comparisons as not controlled for multiplicity, so treat those as supportive rather than formal findings.

Share of people reaching each weight loss at week 72, 17.2 mg vs placebo (Table 6)
Weight lostTrial 1: placeboTrial 1: 17.2 mgTrial 2: placeboTrial 2: 17.2 mg
At least 5%26.8%71.5%26.8%67%
At least 10%13%54.5%9.2%45.6%
At least 15%6%35.9%3.1%25.9%
At least 20%2.9%18.4%0.7%10.8%

Reading the cumulative chart

Figures 3 and 4 plot, for every possible amount of weight change, the share of each group that reached at least that much. The label explains how to read them with an example: draw a vertical line at −10% in Trial 1 and it meets the 17.2 mg curve at about 55% and the placebo curve at about 13% [1].

The useful lesson is that people on the same dose ended up in very different places, and some people on placebo lost a meaningful amount too. Neither trial says what any one person will lose.

Stopping early and missing weights

Not everyone stayed on the trial drug. In Trial 1, 22% to 24% of those on Foundayo™ stopped it, compared with 30% on placebo. In Trial 2, the figures were 19% to 22% against 20% [1].

The results count everyone who was randomised (intent-to-treat). The week-72 weight was missing for 24% of the placebo group and 14% to 16% of the dose groups in Trial 1, and for 13% and 7% to 13% in Trial 2. Missing values were estimated statistically from people in the same group, including those who were still weighed after stopping the drug [1]. This is standard practice, but it is one reason to treat each figure as an estimate.

Other measurements

Table 7 of the label reports changes beyond weight. The rows below are for the top dose; the label marks the blood pressure, pulse and blood fat results as not controlled for multiplicity [1].

Change from baseline at week 72, placebo vs 17.2 mg (Table 7)
MeasureTrial 1: placeboTrial 1: 17.2 mgTrial 2: placeboTrial 2: 17.2 mg
Waist (cm)−3.1−10−2.8−8.3
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)−1.4−6.4−1.5−4.6
Pulse (beats per minute)+0.6+4.6+0.4+3.6
HbA1c (percentage points)−0.1−0.3−0.4−1.7
Non-HDL cholesterol (%)−2−7.7−3−9.7

Safety in the pooled trials

The label pools the two trials for safety, covering 3,155 people on Foundayo™. Side effects led 8% to stop, against 3% on placebo; digestive effects of any kind affected 60% to 69% by dose against 37%, and caused 3% to 6% to stop, against 0.7% [1]. Of those with digestive effects, 60% rated them mild, 36% moderate and 4% severe [1].

Less common findings include acute pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication in 6 people on Foundayo™ against 1 on placebo, and gallstones in 1% against 0.7% [1]. Our symptom pages go through the individual side effects.

The wider trial programme

Several other orforglipron trials have been published as peer-reviewed papers. Most report doses of the investigational formulation, such as 3, 12 or 36 mg, rather than tablet strengths, and none of them is described in the US label. The table summarises each from its abstract.

Published orforglipron trials outside the label, from their abstracts
TrialWho, and for how longCompared withDesignMain result in the abstract
Phase 2, obesity [6]272 adults with obesity or overweight, no diabetes; 36 weeksPlaceboDouble-blind, dose-findingWeight −9.4% to −14.7% at week 36, against −2.3%
ACHIEVE-1 [7]559 adults with early type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise; 40 weeksPlaceboDouble-blindHbA1c −1.24 to −1.48 points against −0.41; weight −4.5% to −7.6% against −1.7%
ACHIEVE-2 [8]962 adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin; 40 weeksDapagliflozin 10 mgOpen-label, orforglipron dose blindedHbA1c −1.23 to −1.56 points against −0.81; stopped the study drug 15% to 20% against 6%
ACHIEVE-3 [9][10]1,698 adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin; 52 weeksOral semaglutide 7 or 14 mgOpen-labelHbA1c −1.71 and −1.91 points against −1.23 and −1.47; weight on treatment −6.7% and −9.2% against −3.7% and −5.3%
ACHIEVE-4 [11]2,749 adults with type 2 diabetes and heart or kidney disease; median 2 yearsInsulin glargineOpen-label, event-drivenMajor cardiovascular events 4.2% against 5.0%, hazard ratio 0.84, meeting the non-inferiority margin
ACHIEVE-5 [12]546 adults with type 2 diabetes on insulin glargine; 40 weeksPlaceboDouble-blindHbA1c −1.58 to −1.88 points against −0.79
ATTAIN-MAINTAIN [13]376 adults who had lost weight on tirzepatide or semaglutide injections; 52 weeksPlaceboDouble-blind, phase 3bAmong those whose weight had plateaued, kept 74.7% (after tirzepatide) and 79.3% (after semaglutide) of the earlier loss, against 49.2% and 37.6%

How to read these studies

  • Group results: every figure above is an average or a share of a group, and none predicts what one person will lose or how their blood sugar will move [1].
  • Open-label designs: in ACHIEVE-2, ACHIEVE-3 and ACHIEVE-4 participants knew which medicine they took, which matters most for reported side effects [8][9][11].
  • Comparators: ACHIEVE-3 used oral semaglutide at the 7 mg and 14 mg diabetes doses, not a weight-management dose, and its weight figure in the registry counts only time on the study drug [9][10]. None of the trials listed here compares orforglipron with a weight-management injection.
  • Safety rather than benefit: ACHIEVE-4 was built to rule out excess cardiovascular risk against insulin glargine, not to show that orforglipron lowers it [11].
  • Maintenance: ATTAIN-MAINTAIN had no group that stayed on the injection and lasted one year; its authors name both as limitations [13].
  • Subgroups: a post hoc analysis of 616 people aged 65 or older in ATTAIN-1 and ATTAIN-2 found weight changes similar to younger participants; post hoc analyses describe, they do not confirm [14]. A pooled analysis of seven phase 3 trials, with 11,220 participants, found no case meeting the criteria for drug-induced liver injury [15].

Foundayo™ is a trademark of Eli Lilly and Company. PepLabo is not affiliated with or endorsed by Eli Lilly and Company.

Questions

What are the orforglipron phase 3 trials called?

The two trials in the Foundayo™ label are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as ATTAIN-1 (NCT05869903, adults without type 2 diabetes) and ATTAIN-2 (NCT05872620, adults with type 2 diabetes) [2][3]. The label calls them Trial 1 and Trial 2. The diabetes trials published separately carry the name ACHIEVE [7][9].

Did people in the trials also diet and exercise?

Everyone, including the placebo groups, received advice on a reduced-calorie diet and physical activity counselling, with at least 150 minutes a week recommended [1]. The results compare the medicine plus that support with placebo plus the same support.

How many people lost at least 10% of their weight?

At 17.2 mg, 54.5% in Trial 1 and 45.6% in Trial 2, against 13% and 9.2% on placebo [1]. At the lower doses the shares were smaller, for example 32.5% at 5.5 mg in Trial 1.

Why do the papers say 36 mg when the label says 17.2 mg?

The trials used an investigational formulation, and the label presents its doses as the equivalent Foundayo™ tablet strengths [1]. The ACHIEVE-4 abstract spells out the top-dose equivalence: a 36 mg capsule corresponds to a 17.2 mg tablet [11].

Has orforglipron been compared directly with another GLP-1 medicine?

Yes, in ACHIEVE-3, an open-label trial in adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, against oral semaglutide 7 mg and 14 mg [9]. HbA1c fell more with orforglipron, while digestive side effects, stopping for side effects and the pulse rise were more frequent [9]. It did not test weight-management doses.

Were older adults included?

Yes. In the pooled label trials, 13% of people on Foundayo™ were 65 or older and 1% were 75 or older, with no overall differences in safety or effectiveness [1]. A separate post hoc analysis of 616 participants aged 65 or older reported similar weight changes to younger adults [14].

Sources

Sources checked on

  1. FOUNDAYO™ (orforglipron) tablets Prescribing Information, Eli Lilly and Company Revised 07/2026. Sections 2.1, 5.2, 5.8, 6.1, 8.5 and 14 (Tables 6 and 7, Figures 3 and 4).
  2. A Study of Orforglipron (LY3502970) in Adult Participants With Obesity or Overweight With Weight-Related Comorbidities (ATTAIN-1), ClinicalTrials.gov Registry record NCT05869903.
  3. A Study of Orforglipron in Adult Participants With Obesity or Overweight and Type 2 Diabetes (ATTAIN-2), ClinicalTrials.gov Registry record NCT05872620.
  4. Wharton S et al. Orforglipron, an oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist for obesity treatment (ATTAIN-1). N Engl J Med 2025;393:1796-1806 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract. Funded by Eli Lilly.
  5. Horn DB et al. Orforglipron for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (ATTAIN-2). Lancet 2026 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract. Funded by Eli Lilly and Company.
  6. Wharton S et al. Daily oral GLP-1 receptor agonist orforglipron for adults with obesity. N Engl J Med 2023;389:877-888 Randomised, double-blind phase 2 trial; PubMed abstract. Funded by Eli Lilly.
  7. Rosenstock J et al. Orforglipron, an oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist, in early type 2 diabetes (ACHIEVE-1). N Engl J Med 2025;393:1065-1076 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract. Supported by Eli Lilly.
  8. Welch M et al. Orforglipron compared with dapagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control with metformin (ACHIEVE-2). Lancet 2026;408:125-140 Open-label randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract. Funded by Eli Lilly and Company.
  9. Rosenstock J et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily oral orforglipron compared with oral semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (ACHIEVE-3). Lancet 2026;407:1147-1160 Open-label randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract. Funded by Eli Lilly.
  10. A Study of Orforglipron (LY3502970) Compared With Semaglutide in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin (ACHIEVE-3), results, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06045221. Secondary outcome: percent change in body weight at week 52, data while on the study drug.
  11. Klein KR et al. Cardiovascular safety of orforglipron versus insulin glargine in adults with type 2 diabetes at increased cardiovascular risk (ACHIEVE-4). Lancet 2026;408:1557-1570 Event-driven, open-label randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract. Funded by Eli Lilly and Company.
  12. Giorgino F et al. Orforglipron added to titrated insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: the ACHIEVE-5 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2026;336:389-399 Randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial; PubMed abstract.
  13. Aronne LJ et al. Orforglipron for maintenance of body weight reduction: the double-blind, randomized phase 3b ATTAIN-MAINTAIN trial. Nat Med 2026;32:2679-2687 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b trial; PubMed abstract.
  14. Horn DB et al. Orforglipron for obesity treatment in older patients ≥65 years with or without type 2 diabetes: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the ATTAIN-1 and ATTAIN-2 trials. Obes Pillars 2026;19:100301 Post hoc subgroup analysis; PubMed abstract.
  15. Wharton S et al. Hepatic safety of orforglipron in adults with obesity or overweight and/or type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of the orforglipron phase 3 clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2026;28:8347-8358 Pooled analysis of seven phase 3 trials; PubMed abstract.

Set up your lab tonight.

It takes a few minutes. Pep will be waiting.